Mitt Romney’s campaign may or may not be vetting Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) for vice presidential consideration, but in the meantime, he continues to maintain space in the media spotlight. In an interview with Christianity Today published yesterday, he reiterated his opposition to same-sex marriage, pointing out that the Bible opposes it, as do all of the faiths (Catholic, Mormon, evangelical Christian) he’s experienced. Though he qualified his answer in some ways, he also suggested that society shouldn’t “tolerate” less-than-”ideal” family structures:
RUBIO: In terms of the Bible’s interpretation of marriage, what our faith teaches is pretty straightforward. There’s not much debate about that. The debate is about what society should tolerate, and what society should allow our laws to be. I believe marriage is a unique and specific institution that is the result of thousands of years of wisdom, which concluded that the ideal — not the only way but certainly the ideal — situation to raise children to become productive and healthy humans is in a home with a father and mother married to each other.
Just in case anyone needed someone they wanted to throw rocks at today. My suggestion, this guy.
The bible also tolerates polygamy and incest. Should we tolerate those? And what about Ruth and Naomi? (“Ruth loved...
Fair is fair, Mr. Rubio. Floridians are having to ‘tolerate’ you.
Not only that, but an argument based on the bible has absolutely no motherfucking place in politics.
So the “non-conformists” should conform to a series of laws and regulations based on a holy text under a government that...