The Romney/Ryan proposal to transform Medicare’s guaranteed benefit into a “premium support” structure for future retirees could increase costs by almost $60,000 for seniors reaching the age of 65 in 2023, a new report from the Center for American Progress finds. Current seniors would also have to pay more for preventive, hospital, and physician services should Romney and Ryan repeal the Affordable Care Act, facing an increase in health spending of between $7,900 and $18,600 over the course of their retirement.

 If seniors choose a plan that costs more than the voucher, they will have to pay the difference. As a result, most seniors will have to spend more on coverage. Here are 5 reasons why:

1) Current seniors will pay more. The premium support structure does not kick in until 2023, so current seniors will remain in the existing Medicare program. But should Romney/Ryan repeal the Affordable Care Act’s savings, beneficiaries will face higher cost sharing and premiums (particularly for preventive services) and seniors who have received prescription drug discounts, will now pay more for their medications. What’s more, Romney/Ryan would lower Medicaid spending significantly beginning next year, shifting federal spending to states and beneficiaries, and increasing costs for the 9 million Medicare recipients who are dependent on Medicaid.

2) Cost shift to future retirees. The average beneficiary will receive a premium support credit of $7,500 in 2023 to purchase coverage in traditional Medicare or private insurance. But that amount will only grow at a rate of GDP plus 1.5 percentage points and will not keep up with health care costs. So while the federal government will spend less on the program, seniors will pay more in premiums.

3) Private insurers will charge more. Private plans lack the market clout and efficiencies of traditional Medicare, experience higher profits and administrative costs, and will charge more for the same coverage seniors currently enjoy in the traditional program.

4) Private insurers will cherry pick the healthiest beneficiaries. The existing private plans in Medicare — insurers that participate in Medicare Advantage — have long attracted the healthiest, lowest-cost enrollees from the Medicare population. Without robust regulations, private insurers will have an incentive to ramp up benefits that attract healthier seniors (i.e. preventive services), while playing down care that sicker beneficiaries rely on (i.e. chemotherapy or services to manage expensive chronic conditions).

h/t: Igor Volsky at Think Progress Election

  1. octopusonrollerskates reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  2. teababe27 reblogged this from jackpowerx
  3. occupy-my-blog reblogged this from questionall
  4. sameoldantics reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  5. trotskitty reblogged this from jackpowerx
  6. theyoungwitch reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  7. nachsie reblogged this from jackpowerx
  8. jackpowerx reblogged this from trotskitty and added:
    D - Also known as the “Survival of the Fittest Act of 2013”
  9. sleepyblacksheep reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  10. thepoliticalfreakshow reblogged this from questionall
  11. questionall reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  12. gerbear11 reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  13. marinareise reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  14. leftistnaija reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  15. snack-ops reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  16. pearlrose52411 reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  17. truth-has-a-liberal-bias reblogged this from justinspoliticalcorner
  18. aberombie reblogged this from justinspoliticalcorner
  19. superbuffet reblogged this from justinspoliticalcorner
  20. voteformickeymouse reblogged this from justinspoliticalcorner
  21. justinspoliticalcorner posted this