Countdown Clocks

Countdown Clocks

Tweets by @JGibsonDem

Fresh from claiming the GOP’s 2012 run was “a great campaign—a nine-month campaign”; that only went awry at the end, Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus now wants to rig the Electoral College so that when Republicans lose they still might “win.”

Specifically, Priebus is urging Republican governors and legislators to take up what was once a fringe scheme to change the rule for distribution of Electoral College votes. Under the Priebus plan, electoral votes from battleground states such as Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Wisconsin and other states that now regularly back Democrats for president would be allocated not to the statewide winner but to the winners of individual congressional districts.

Because of gerrymandering by Republican governors and legislators, and the concentration of Democratic votes in urban areas and college towns, divvying up Electoral College votes based on congressional district wins would yield significantly better results for the GOP. In Wisconsin, where Democrat Barack Obama won in 2012 by a wider margin than he did nationally, the president would only have gotten half the electoral votes. In Pennsylvania, where Obama won easily, he would not have gotten the twenty electoral votes that he did; instead, under the Priebus plan, it would have been eight for Republican Mitt Romney, twelve for Barack Obama.

Nationwide, Obama won a sweeping popular-vote victory—with an almost 5-million ballot margin that made him the first president since Dwight Eisenhower to take more than 51 percent of the vote in two elections. That translated to a very comfortable 322-206 win in the Electoral College.

How would the 2012 results have changed if a Priebus plan had been in place? According to an analysis byFair Vote-The Center for Voting and Democracy, the results would have been a dramatically closer and might even have yielded a Romney win.

Under the most commonly proposed district plan (the statewide winner gets two votes with the rest divided by congressional district) Obama would have secured the narrowest possible win: 270-268. Under more aggressive plans (including one that awards electoral votes by district and then gives the two statewide votes to the candidate who won the most districts), Romney would have won 280-258.

“If Republicans in 2011 had abused their monopoly control of state government in several key swing states and passed new laws for allocating electoral votes, the exact same votes cast in the exact same way in the 2012 election would have converted Barack Obama’s advantage of nearly five million popular votes and 126 electoral votes into a resounding Electoral College defeat,” explains FairVote’s Rob Richie.

The RNC chair is encouraging Republican governors and legislators—who, thanks to the “Republican wave” election of 2010, still control many battleground states that backed Obama and the Democrats in 2012—to game the system.

“I think it’s something that a lot of states that have been consistently blue [Democratic in presidential politics] that are fully controlled red [in the statehouse] ought to be considering,” Priebus says with regard to the schemes for distributing electoral votes by district rather than the traditional awarding of the votes of each state (except Nebraska and Maine, which have historically used narrowly defined district plans) to the winner.

Already, there are moves afoot in a number of battleground states to “fix” the rules to favor the Republicans in 2016, just as they have already fixed the district lines for electing members of the House. Thanks to gerrymandering and the concentration of Democratic votes, Republicans were able to lose the overall nationwide vote for US House seats by 1.4 million votes and still take control of the chamber—thus giving the United States the divided government that voters have rejected.

h/t: John Nichols at The Nation

  1. awalt2069 reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  2. oneluv918 reblogged this from liberal-focus
  3. liberal-focus reblogged this from 6dogs9cats
  4. mellydraws reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  5. slephoto reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias and added:
    Scary.
  6. theliberaltony reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  7. manic-metanoiac reblogged this from kalooeh
  8. isyris reblogged this from kalooeh
  9. randomactsofchaos reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  10. kalooeh reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  11. pinkbaron reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  12. jadedskeptic reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  13. truth-has-a-liberal-bias reblogged this from recall-all-republicans
  14. chipmunksback reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  15. notoriousjoev reblogged this from realworldnews
  16. thesocialmedianerd reblogged this from contentment-of-cats
  17. poofyphluff reblogged this from contentment-of-cats
  18. jkruton reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  19. contentment-of-cats reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  20. rifkind-moonchild reblogged this from real-news
  21. jessicathemess reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  22. tira-angevox reblogged this from vinylsticker and added:
    Wtf…what sore ass losers.
  23. yugurenoryu reblogged this from hellamyblake
  24. astraymind reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  25. morextrememe reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  26. hellamyblake reblogged this from spartanninja
  27. spartanninja reblogged this from realworldnews
  28. kristinacolbert reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  29. realworldnews reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  30. real-news reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president