WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican-led House on Tuesday passed a far-reaching anti-abortion bill that conservatives saw as a milestone in their 40-year campaign against legalized abortion and Democrats condemned as yet another example of the GOP war on women.
The legislation, sparked by the murder conviction of a Philadelphia late-term abortion provider, would restrict almost all abortions to the first 20 weeks after conception, defying laws in most states that allow abortions up to when the fetus becomes viable, usually considered to be around 24 weeks.
It mirrors 20-week abortion ban laws passed by some states, and lays further groundwork for the ongoing legal battle that abortion foes hope will eventually result in forcing the Supreme Court to reconsider the 1973 Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, that made abortion legal.
It passed 228-196, with 6 Democrats voting for it and 6 Republicans voting against it.
In the short term, the bill will go nowhere. The Democratic-controlled Senate will ignore it and the White House says the president would veto it if it ever reached his desk. The White House said the measure was “an assault on a woman’s right to choose” and “a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade.”
But it was a banner day for social conservatives who have generally seen their priorities overshadowed by economic and budgetary issues since Republicans recaptured the House in 2010.
Democrats chided Republicans for taking up a dead-end abortion bill when Congress is doing little to promote jobs and economic growth. Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi called it “yet another Republican attempt to endanger women. It is disrespectful to women. It is unsafe for families and it is unconstitutional.”
Democrats also said the decision by GOP leaders to appease their restless base with the abortion vote could backfire on Republican efforts to improve their standing among women.
“They are going down the same road that helped women elect Barack Obama president of the United States,” said Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia’s delegate to the House. The bill is so egregious to women, said Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., that women are reminded that “the last possible thing they ever want to do is leave their health policy to these men in blue suits and red ties.”
Democrats repeatedly pointed out that all 23 Republicans on the Judiciary Committee that approved the measure last week on a party-line vote are men.
Republicans countered by assigning women to conspicuous roles in managing the bill on the House floor and presiding over the chamber. Republican women were prominent among those speaking in favor of the legislation.
The bill, said Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., who was assigned to manage the bill despite not being on the Judiciary Committee, would “send the clearest possible message to the American people that we do not support more Gosnell-like abortions.”
After Franks’ remark, which he later modified, Republicans quietly altered the bill to include an exception to the 20-week ban for instances of rape and incest. Democrats still balked, saying the exception would require a woman to prove that she had reported the rape to authorities.
The bill has an exception when a physical condition threatens the life of the mother, but Democratic efforts to include other health exceptions were rebuffed.
The legislation would ban abortions that take place 20 weeks after conception, which is equivalent to 22 weeks of pregnancy.
Some 10 states have passed laws similar to the House bill, and several are facing court challenges. Last month a federal court struck down as unconstitutional Arizona’s law, which differs slightly in banning abortion 20 weeks after pregnancy rather than conception.
Thankfully, the Democratic-controlled Senate and the White House’s threat of a veto makes this anti-reproductive choice bill from ever taking effect.
h/t: AP.org
In many states, it takes longer to get an abortion than it does to purchase a gun. Twenty-six states require women to wait for an abortion, usually 24 hours after an initial counseling session
(via winningprogressive)
Texas Gov. Rick Perry signs ‘Merry Christmas’ bill into law
The Texas law removes legal risks of saying “Merry Christmas” in schools and protects traditional holiday symbols, as long as more than one religion is also reflected.
Four killed in shooting at St. Louis business center, police say
(Photo: KSDK-TV)
Four people were killed in a shooting incident Thursday inside a business development center in St. Louis, police said.
Cory Gardner is a very right-wing backbencher from eastern Colorado. He found himself in Congress after the Great Blue Dog Apocalypse of 2010 swept away a confused and worthless Blue Dog, Betsy Markey, her Democratic base refusing to come out to vote for her after she ignored them and voted with the Republicans over and over again. A Tancredo-disciple, Gardner is probably best known in his state as an anti-immigrant fanatic and a virulent racist and bigot. He was reelected last November 59-37%. Now there is a movement in 8 of the counties in his district trying to secede from Colorado. He won each of those counties last year:
Kit Carson- 79%
Logan- 72%
Morgan- 67%
Phillips- 76%
Sedgwick- 72%
Washington- 87%
Weld- 55%
Yuma- 84%
Most of these are tiny counties. Gardner’s 72% landslide in Sedgwick, for example, amounted to 925 votes. His 76% win in Phillips was 1,662 votes. Only one county of the 8 has a sizable population, Weld, which includes northern Denver suburbs. Gardner won there 59,576 (55%) to 42,514 (40%). Over a quarter million people live there. Less than 1% of the folks are African-American and the only minority group with more than 1% are Hispanics— 27%. It’s one of America’s richest agricultural counties— and the richest outside of California. It is the center of Colorado’s cattle, grain, sugar beets and dairy industries. Obama, who beat Romney 51-47% statewide, lost all 8 of these counties and Weld was the only one where he got to 40%— 42% to be precise. Obama only won 18% of the vote in Washington County. I’m surprised they only want to secede from Colorado and not from the U.S. The movement’s leaders say they want out because they oppose regulation of the oil and gas industries (and guns). Do you wonder who’s paying for the movement?
We really feel in northern and northeastern Colorado that we are ignored— citizens’ concerns are ignored, and we truly feel disenfranchised,” Weld County Commissioner Sean Conway told CBS4.
Conway said the new laws don’t support the interests of the northern part of the state, which is rich in agricultural history. Conway said that’s why he and others are proposing to break away from Colorado to form a new state.
“This is not a stunt. This is a very serious deliberative discussion that’s going on,” he said. “There’s a real feeling that a lot of folks who come from the urban areas don’t appreciate the contribution that many Coloradans contribute.”
Parts of Nebraska are also apparently interested in joining in on what would be a new state. Conway says five of the current 50 states were created through a similar process. He says the proposal is “likely” to end up on a Colorado ballot this fall.
“The whole purpose of doing this is to preserve an agricultural way of life and to protect the energy sector, that we feel is very much under assault,” Conway said.
Rep. Cory Gardner, the Republican Congressman from Yuma, told The Coloradoan in Fort Collins he’s not sure how he’d vote on such a measure, but he says he understands why the measure is being floated at this time. He says Democratic leaders controlling the state Legislature and the governor’s office have not been listening to their constituents in rural parts of the state.
Gardner may see himself as a potential governor of the 51st state, which has about 6% of Colorado’s population (333,000 people, give or take). He says “the people of rural Colorado are mad, and they have every right to be. The governor and his Democrat colleagues in the statehouse have assaulted our way of life, and I don’t blame these people one bit for feeling attacked and unrepresented by the leaders of our state.”
Santa Monica shooting: Two dead, at least six headed to the hospital
The full story of the sudden shooting spree near Santa Monica College earlier today is still emerging, but here are the details so far:
An alleged gunman, who has been wounded by police, opened fire at 11:55 a.m. at “multiple locations,” according to authorities, after breaking into one area residence and setting fire to another. It was in the building that had been set on fire that two bodies were found. Following that, the individual reportedly tried to carjack two vehicles and opened fire on other cars.
The suspected gunman has since been apprehended by police. And though the bomb squad has been called to the scene, authorities at this time still believe there is only one shooter.
From the account of Andrey Priadkin, who was studying for finals when he heard screams:
“I saw a guy wearing all black, holding a big gun. He looked very calm. I stared at him. I’m thinking maybe he’s a police force.”
The man stared at Priadkin for about “three to four seconds” before he turned and began firing, Priadkin said.
“That’s when I realized I have to go,” he said. “I just ran.”
Read the latest updates over at L.A. Now.
Photos: Michael Nelson / EPA, Kevork Djansezian / Getty Images, Aaron Smith / Los Angeles Times
CENTENNIAL, Colo. (AP) - A judge has accepted James’ Holmes plea of not guilty by reason of insanity in the Colorado theater shootings.If the evaluations prove that he is mentally ill, then the common “crazy lone wolf” rhetoric can be upheld, and we won’t have to question the status quo. If the evaluations show that he is not mentally ill, and is found guilty, we must ask ourselves what kind of society we are creating that fosters actions such as this.
When the term “going postal” came about, it was largely due to the U.S. Postal Service and supervisors/managers repeating rhetoric to the media trying to distance themselves from any responsibility of their abusive practices, and pin sole responsibility for workplace violence on just some crazy lone wolf type guy. By the early 1990s there were over 500 cases of workplace violence in the U.S. Postal Service. After that, workplace violence began springing up in the rest of the corporate world. And then it spread to schools. And then it spread to the streets.
So is he insane? Or is he a product of society at large (the same way that media views non-white violence, that violence itself is a result of violent culture)? Neither assumption (insane or not) absolves him of his actions. But one of them absolves the abusers of theirs, and that is something worth considering.
U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) dies, according to @northjerseybrk: thkpr.gs/10Txf6s
— ThinkProgress (@thinkprogress) June 3, 2013
SAD.
…The ruling handed down by a federal judge is peppered with stinging criticism of the policies and practices of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, saying the sheriff relied on racial profiling and illegal detentions.
The ruling is a result of a federal civil trial last summer in which Sheriff Arpaio and his office were accused in a class-action lawsuit of singling out Latinos for stops, questioning and detention. It says deputies considered the prevalence of Latinos when deciding where to carry out enforcement operations, in many cases in response to complaints based solely on assumptions that Latinos or “Mexicans,” as some complainants put it, were necessarily illegal immigrants.
Regardless of the type of enforcement — workplace raids, traffic stops or targeted patrols in areas frequented by day laborers — Sheriff Arpaio’s deputies were required to keep track of the number of people arrested on federal immigration violations, as well as state charges, Judge Snow said. In news releases, Sheriff Arpaio’s office often referred to the operations as integral parts of the sheriff’s “illegal immigrant stance.”
Cecillia Wang, director of the Immigrants’ Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union, one of the groups that brought the lawsuit, said, “Let this be a warning to anyone who hides behind a badge to wage their own private campaign against Latinos or immigrants that there is no exception in the Constitution for violating people’s rights in immigration enforcement.”…read more at New York Times.
From the Seattle Times twitter page, another view of the bridge collapse in Washington. Check out more of the Times’ coverage over this way. (via @BreakingTweets)

Great NEWS, even if it is only partial victory.
Ex-congressman Anthony Weiner said in a campaign video announcement last night that he’s in the New York City mayoral race. Get the complete story.
NEW YORK, NY – Yahoo announced a $1.1 billion deal for blogging site Tumblr early Monday, and said it “promises not to screw it up.”
The deal, which had been rumored since last Thursday, will help Yahoo to tap into the younger, active online user base at Tumblr. But the deal raises concerns among some Tumblr fans that the site could end up being cluttered by the ads that brings in billions of dollars a year to Yahoo. Tumblr CEO and founder David Karp has resisted the use of traditional display advertising on Tumblr to this point.
To answer those worries, Yahoo said that Tumblr will be independently operated as a separate business with Karp staying on as CEO. Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer posted her own Tumblr post to try to assure fans of the site they need not panic. In a call with investors and analysts Monday, Mayer referred to the deal as a “game changer” for Yahoo. She said there will be no Yahoo branding on Tumblr.
But while she sought to assure Tumblr bloggers and readers that the site will stay the way they like it, she also promised analysts that the deal will give Yahoo a chance to “monetize” Tumblr in a way that “is meaningful … to the user experience.”
Karp also sought to assure Tumblr bloggers.
“Our team isn’t changing. Our roadmap isn’t changing,” said Karp in a statement. “Tumblr gets better faster with more resources to draw from.”
h/t: Fox2now.com
BREAKING: The Minnesota State Senate passes #HF1054 37-30, making it the 12th state to legalize marriage equality. #MN4M #MNUnited
— Justin Gibson (@JGibsonDem) May 13, 2013
BREAKING: Dr. Kermit Gosnell Found Guilty of Three Counts of First-Degree Murder
UPDATE: Gosnell is guilty of three of four counts of 1st-degree murder. More to come…
Original Post: Just a few hours after the jury announced a deadlock on two of the charges in a murder trial that’s gained as much notoriety for its sickening crimes as its controversial (lack of) coverage (and news), the court has announced that the jury has reached a verdict on all 260+ counts against Philadelphia abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell. The court will reconvene shortly to read the verdict and we’ll have updates as soon as it’s announced.
Gosnell is accused of numerous crimes arising from his abortion practice, including five counts of murder—four for babies that he allegedly killed after they were born alive, and one for the death of one of his adult patients. (Three other murder charges were dropped during the trial, though there were accusations of many, many more illegal abortions.) He was also accused of performing numerous late-term abortions, carried out long after they are legally allowed and sometimes on underage patients. There were also many charges for offenses related to abuse and mismanagement of prescription drugs and violations of state health codes, including using unlicensed office assistants and allowing untrained workers to administer anesthesia and other medicines.